The Financial Guys

Social Security and “Spousal Only” Benefits using the Restricted Application

Senior couple interacting with each other
Picture of Mike Hoeflich

Mike Hoeflich

Social Security and “Spousal Only” Benefits using the Restricted Application

Share this post

Are YOU Grandfathered for Potential Use of this Unique Claiming Strategy?

The enactment of the Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2000 on April 7, 2000, was significant in that it eliminated the Social Security Retirement Earnings Test (earnings test) for a worker that reached Full Retirement Age (FRA) thereby allowing the worker at FRA to earn as high of an earned income (W2 wages or self-employed net earnings) as they wished, without a reduction in his or her Social Security payment. This alleviated forfeiture of Social Security benefit income for FRA and post-FRA claimants. Perhaps more significantly, the legislation allowed for the ability for workers who had reached FRA to “file” for benefits, but immediately “suspend” receiving payments and earn Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs) for each month that payments were deferred. This strategy was appropriately referred to as “File and Suspend”.

Why would a retiree file for benefits only to then suspend those benefits and not receive payments? Single individuals may not have had an incentive for this route of filing, but married filers would because the spouse of the “File and Suspend” applicant upon reaching FRA, could restrict his or her own filing for benefits to a “spousal only” benefit amount equal to one half of the PIA of the spouse who filed and suspended. Thus, the term “Restricted Application” arose. In the meantime, both spouses would benefit from DRCs on their own respective benefit values.

Those who believe that “File and Suspend” and the use of “Restricted Application” were eliminated with the passing of The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 would only be partially correct. Requests for “File and Suspend” were granted to those that had reached FRA and had applied on or before April 29, 2016. Doing so would allow the applicant to receive DRCs while auxiliary (spousal or children’s) benefits would be unaffected. The “File and Suspend” privilege as described is far in the rearview mirror at this point; however, the use of “Restricted Application is not!

 Who is still eligible for “Restricted Application”? Let’s look at the two individual types that may still be eligible:

  1. married individual who:
    1. Was born on or before January 1, 1954;
    2. Who has now reached FRA;
    3. Whose spouse had either “Filed and Suspended” when it was possible to do so or more likely have now filed for his or her own benefits,

is eligible.

  1. divorced individual who:
    1. Was born on or before January 1, 1954;
    2. Who has now reached FRA;
    3. Whose ex-spouse is entitled and has Filed and Taken his or her benefit, or from whom the individual has been divorced for TWO YEARS, making the individual eligible as an Independently Entitled Divorced Spouse (IEDS),

is eligible.

Note, these individuals became eligible to make this unique filing on January 1, 2020, when reaching FRA. In other words, they were grandfathered into a strategy based on legislation from 2015, that they would not even be able to utilize for a minimum of four years from the legislation date!

Let’s follow how use of the “Restricted Application” worked for married couple Joe and Maria:  It is October 1, 2019. Joe claimed his own reduced benefit in July 2015, at age 62 upon retiring. His PIA was $2,200. Maria, whose date of birth was December 7, 1953, continues to work full-time and has not claimed her Social Security benefit. Her PIA is $2,500; she understands how the power of DRCs will help increase her benefit by 8% per year (2/3% per month) for as long as she delays, and as late as age 70 when her benefit will reach its maximum. She also knows she would be impacted by the earnings test if she claims her own benefit and makes in excess of the earnings allowed by that provision. However, the earnings test is no longer a factor once Maria reaches FRA in December 2020, AND she is grandfathered in for the use of the “Restricted Application” strategy! Maria “restricts” her filing for January 2020 for a “spousal only” benefit, which will be equal to one-half of Joe’s PIA of $2,200. She will receive $1,100 per month, continue to work, make her full-time salary without forfeitures due to the earnings test, and receive DRCs on her own PIA. Without even considering the Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) she may accrue, over the four years that she plans to receive the “spousal only” benefit, she will have received $52,800! Her own benefit, which she plans to switch to at age 70, will grow to $3,300 per month!

Before you simply believe the half-truths and rhetoric relating to “File and Suspend” and “Restricted Application”, possibly costing you tens of thousands of retirement income dollars, talk to a Certified Social Security Claiming Strategist to help you understand if you are grandfathered into the ability to do a spousal only, “Restricted Application”.  Check out our other post: Social Security and Spousal Benefits: What You Need to Know and Spousal Benefits for Independently Entitled Divorced Spouse (IEDS)

“Securities offered through Peak Brokerage Services, LLC. Member FINRA /SIPC , Advisory services offered through Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC., an SEC Registered Investment Adviser.

The Financial Guys and Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC. are not affiliates of Peak Brokerage Services, LLC.”

Share this post

Car driving on a winter road

Why Preparing Your Car and Home and Choosing the Right Insurance Matters | The Financial Guys Home and Auto

As temperatures drop, it’s time to start thinking about winterizing your car and home. Preparing for winter isn’t just about staying cozy—it’s also about protecting your property and ensuring peace of mind. From winter storms to icy roads, cold weather brings an abundance of risks. Having the right home and auto insurance can be the decisive factor when the unexpected happens. The Financial Guys Home and Auto Division is here to help with a quick guide on getting winter-ready and why your insurance coverage is so important.

Read More »

“Securities offered through Peak Brokerage Services, LLC. Member FINRA /SIPC , Advisory services offered through Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC., an SEC Registered Investment Adviser.

The Financial Guys and Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC. are not affiliates of Peak Brokerage Services, LLC.”

Sign Up For Our Newsletter!

Get an email every time we're In The News

Senior couple interacting with each other
Picture of Mike Hoeflich

Mike Hoeflich

Social Security and “Spousal Only” Benefits using the Restricted Application

Share this post

Are YOU Grandfathered for Potential Use of this Unique Claiming Strategy?

The enactment of the Senior Citizens’ Freedom to Work Act of 2000 on April 7, 2000, was significant in that it eliminated the Social Security Retirement Earnings Test (earnings test) for a worker that reached Full Retirement Age (FRA) thereby allowing the worker at FRA to earn as high of an earned income (W2 wages or self-employed net earnings) as they wished, without a reduction in his or her Social Security payment. This alleviated forfeiture of Social Security benefit income for FRA and post-FRA claimants. Perhaps more significantly, the legislation allowed for the ability for workers who had reached FRA to “file” for benefits, but immediately “suspend” receiving payments and earn Delayed Retirement Credits (DRCs) for each month that payments were deferred. This strategy was appropriately referred to as “File and Suspend”.

Why would a retiree file for benefits only to then suspend those benefits and not receive payments? Single individuals may not have had an incentive for this route of filing, but married filers would because the spouse of the “File and Suspend” applicant upon reaching FRA, could restrict his or her own filing for benefits to a “spousal only” benefit amount equal to one half of the PIA of the spouse who filed and suspended. Thus, the term “Restricted Application” arose. In the meantime, both spouses would benefit from DRCs on their own respective benefit values.

Those who believe that “File and Suspend” and the use of “Restricted Application” were eliminated with the passing of The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 would only be partially correct. Requests for “File and Suspend” were granted to those that had reached FRA and had applied on or before April 29, 2016. Doing so would allow the applicant to receive DRCs while auxiliary (spousal or children’s) benefits would be unaffected. The “File and Suspend” privilege as described is far in the rearview mirror at this point; however, the use of “Restricted Application is not!

 Who is still eligible for “Restricted Application”? Let’s look at the two individual types that may still be eligible:

  1. married individual who:
    1. Was born on or before January 1, 1954;
    2. Who has now reached FRA;
    3. Whose spouse had either “Filed and Suspended” when it was possible to do so or more likely have now filed for his or her own benefits,

is eligible.

  1. divorced individual who:
    1. Was born on or before January 1, 1954;
    2. Who has now reached FRA;
    3. Whose ex-spouse is entitled and has Filed and Taken his or her benefit, or from whom the individual has been divorced for TWO YEARS, making the individual eligible as an Independently Entitled Divorced Spouse (IEDS),

is eligible.

Note, these individuals became eligible to make this unique filing on January 1, 2020, when reaching FRA. In other words, they were grandfathered into a strategy based on legislation from 2015, that they would not even be able to utilize for a minimum of four years from the legislation date!

Let’s follow how use of the “Restricted Application” worked for married couple Joe and Maria:  It is October 1, 2019. Joe claimed his own reduced benefit in July 2015, at age 62 upon retiring. His PIA was $2,200. Maria, whose date of birth was December 7, 1953, continues to work full-time and has not claimed her Social Security benefit. Her PIA is $2,500; she understands how the power of DRCs will help increase her benefit by 8% per year (2/3% per month) for as long as she delays, and as late as age 70 when her benefit will reach its maximum. She also knows she would be impacted by the earnings test if she claims her own benefit and makes in excess of the earnings allowed by that provision. However, the earnings test is no longer a factor once Maria reaches FRA in December 2020, AND she is grandfathered in for the use of the “Restricted Application” strategy! Maria “restricts” her filing for January 2020 for a “spousal only” benefit, which will be equal to one-half of Joe’s PIA of $2,200. She will receive $1,100 per month, continue to work, make her full-time salary without forfeitures due to the earnings test, and receive DRCs on her own PIA. Without even considering the Cost of Living Adjustments (COLAs) she may accrue, over the four years that she plans to receive the “spousal only” benefit, she will have received $52,800! Her own benefit, which she plans to switch to at age 70, will grow to $3,300 per month!

Before you simply believe the half-truths and rhetoric relating to “File and Suspend” and “Restricted Application”, possibly costing you tens of thousands of retirement income dollars, talk to a Certified Social Security Claiming Strategist to help you understand if you are grandfathered into the ability to do a spousal only, “Restricted Application”.  Check out our other post: Social Security and Spousal Benefits: What You Need to Know and Spousal Benefits for Independently Entitled Divorced Spouse (IEDS)

“Securities offered through Peak Brokerage Services, LLC. Member FINRA /SIPC , Advisory services offered through Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC., an SEC Registered Investment Adviser.

The Financial Guys and Independent Solutions Wealth Management LLC. are not affiliates of Peak Brokerage Services, LLC.”

Share this post

Amherst Hotel Under Scrutiny for Housing Illegal Immigrants | Financial Guys Media

The Red Roof Inn – located in Amherst, NY, has been operating as housing for illegal immigrants. The local community has become outraged by the situation and is growing more concerned about the increased activity around the hotel. Concerns have been raised regarding the facility’s capacity, potential strain on local resources, and impact on public safety standards.

Read More »